1964 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 575 kg more than 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Sunbeam Tiger | 2010 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Sunbeam | Chevrolet |
Model | Tiger | Camaro |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4261 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 304 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2852 mm |