1964 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2005 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2005 Toyota Highlander is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Highlander (148 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 1185 kg more than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Highlander (221 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. (33 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2005 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Suzuki Fronte | 2005 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Suzuki | Toyota |
Model | Fronte | Highlander |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 360 cc | 2360 cc |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 33 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1685 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2720 mm |