1964 Toyota Corona vs. 1975 Volvo 66
To start off, 1975 Volvo 66 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 1,108 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Volvo 66 (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1964 Toyota Corona. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Volvo 66 should accelerate faster than 1964 Toyota Corona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Toyota Corona weights approximately 120 kg more than 1975 Volvo 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Toyota Corona | 1975 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Corona | 66 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
