1964 Toyota Corona vs. 1996 Honda Integra
To start off, 1996 Honda Integra is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Honda Integra (197 HP) has 127 more horse power than 1964 Toyota Corona. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1964 Toyota Corona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Honda Integra weights approximately 254 kg more than 1964 Toyota Corona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Toyota Corona | 1996 Honda Integra | |
Make | Toyota | Honda |
Model | Corona | Integra |
Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1490 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1199 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2570 mm |