1964 Toyota Corona vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Corona would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 445 kg more than 1964 Toyota Corona.
Because 1964 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Toyota Corona. (68 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Toyota Corona.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Toyota Corona | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Toyota | Mini |
| Model | Corona | Countryman |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1385 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 47 L |
