1964 Toyota Crown vs. 1978 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 1978 Datsun 280Z is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 2,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Datsun 280Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Datsun 280Z (150 HP) has 70 more horse power than 1964 Toyota Crown. (80 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Datsun 280Z should accelerate faster than 1964 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Toyota Crown weights approximately 55 kg more than 1978 Datsun 280Z.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Datsun 280Z (221 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Toyota Crown. (145 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1978 Datsun 280Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Toyota Crown | 1978 Datsun 280Z | |
| Make | Toyota | Datsun |
| Model | Crown | 280Z |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1837 cc | 2753 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 80 HP | 150 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 86.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 22.5:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1255 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4399 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1631 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2304 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 60 L |
