1964 Toyota Crown vs. 2010 Citroen C3
To start off, 2010 Citroen C3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 1,837 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C3 (94 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1964 Toyota Crown. (80 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Citroen C3 weights approximately 79 kg more than 1964 Toyota Crown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Toyota Crown (145 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Citroen C3. (136 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1964 Toyota Crown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Toyota Crown | 2010 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Toyota | Citroen |
Model | Crown | C3 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1837 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 94 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 22.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1255 kg | 1334 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 50 L |