1964 Toyota Crown vs. 2010 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2010 Nissan Rogue is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Rogue (170 HP) has 90 more horse power than 1964 Toyota Crown. (80 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1964 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 233 kg more than 1964 Toyota Crown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Toyota Crown. (145 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Toyota Crown | 2010 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Toyota | Nissan |
Model | Crown | Rogue |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1837 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 170 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1255 kg | 1488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4646 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1659 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 60 L |