1964 Toyota Crown vs. 2010 Renault Logan
To start off, 2010 Renault Logan is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 1,837 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Logan (87 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1964 Toyota Crown. (80 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Logan should accelerate faster than 1964 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Toyota Crown weights approximately 200 kg more than 2010 Renault Logan.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Toyota Crown (145 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Logan. (127 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1964 Toyota Crown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Logan.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Toyota Crown | 2010 Renault Logan | |
| Make | Toyota | Renault |
| Model | Crown | Logan |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1837 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 80 HP | 87 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 22.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1255 kg | 1055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 50 L |
