1964 Toyota Crown vs. 2011 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2011 Smart ForTwo is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 1,837 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Toyota Crown (80 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2011 Smart ForTwo. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Toyota Crown should accelerate faster than 2011 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Toyota Crown weights approximately 415 kg more than 2011 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Toyota Crown (145 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Smart ForTwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1964 Toyota Crown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Toyota Crown | 2011 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Toyota | Smart |
Model | Crown | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1837 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1255 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 33 L |