1964 Toyota Crown vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (288 HP) has 208 more horse power than 1964 Toyota Crown. (80 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 1964 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 542 kg more than 1964 Toyota Crown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Toyota Crown. (145 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Toyota Crown | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Toyota | Dodge |
Model | Crown | CHARGER |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1837 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 288 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1255 kg | 1797 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3052 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 72 L |