1964 Triumph 2000 vs. 2002 Mazda Laputa
To start off, 2002 Mazda Laputa is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2002 Mazda Laputa. (52 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda Laputa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 420 kg more than 2002 Mazda Laputa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda Laputa. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1964 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda Laputa.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Triumph 2000 | 2002 Mazda Laputa | |
Make | Triumph | Mazda |
Model | 2000 | Laputa |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 63 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74.7 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 60.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 30 L |