1964 Triumph 2000 vs. 2003 Volvo S40
To start off, 2003 Volvo S40 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo S40 (138 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo S40 weights approximately 255 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volvo S40 (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Triumph 2000 | 2003 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Triumph | Volvo |
Model | 2000 | S40 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74.7 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 62 L |