1964 Triumph 2000 vs. 2009 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2009 Fiat Stilo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,446 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Fiat Stilo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 95 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Fiat Stilo (221 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Triumph 2000 | 2009 Fiat Stilo | |
| Make | Triumph | Fiat |
| Model | 2000 | Stilo |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2446 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 74.7 mm | 83.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 90.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1265 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 58 L |
