1964 Triumph 2000 vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (233 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 907 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (361 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Triumph 2000 | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Triumph | Toyota |
Model | 2000 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 233 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 361 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74.7 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 95 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 2077 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 5329 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1935 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3221 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 100 L |