1964 Triumph Spitfire vs. 1989 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1989 Ford Ranger is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1964 Triumph Spitfire. (62 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph Spitfire.
Because 1989 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Triumph Spitfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Triumph Spitfire | 1989 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Triumph | Ford |
Model | Spitfire | Ranger |
Year Released | 1964 | 1989 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1147 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4690 mm |