1964 Triumph Spitfire vs. 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet
To start off, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 1,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet (99 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1964 Triumph Spitfire. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph Spitfire.
Because 1964 Triumph Spitfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Triumph Spitfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Triumph Spitfire | 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet | |
| Make | Triumph | Aston Martin |
| Model | Spitfire | Cygnet |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1147 cc | 1300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 99 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
