1964 Triumph Spitfire vs. 2012 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2012 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Daewoo Tocsa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Daewoo Tocsa (153 HP) has 91 more horse power than 1964 Triumph Spitfire. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Daewoo Tocsa should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph Spitfire.
Because 1964 Triumph Spitfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Triumph Spitfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Daewoo Tocsa (237 Nm) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph Spitfire. (91 Nm). This means 2012 Daewoo Tocsa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Triumph Spitfire | 2012 Daewoo Tocsa | |
Make | Triumph | Daewoo |
Model | Spitfire | Tocsa |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1147 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 91 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2700 mm |