1964 Triumph TR4 vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph TR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph TR4 would be higher. At 2,138 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Triumph TR4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1964 Triumph TR4. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph TR4.
Because 1964 Triumph TR4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Triumph TR4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Triumph TR4 | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Triumph | Ford |
| Model | TR4 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2138 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2490 mm |
