1964 Volkswagen 1500 vs. 2005 Volvo S80
To start off, 2005 Volvo S80 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 2,917 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo S80 (268 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo S80 weights approximately 811 kg more than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Volkswagen 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Volkswagen 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Volkswagen 1500 | 2005 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Volkswagen | Volvo |
Model | 1500 | S80 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1493 cc | 2917 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1741 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 80 L |