1964 Volkswagen 1500 vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 706 kg more than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Volkswagen 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Volkswagen 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Volkswagen 1500 | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Cadillac |
| Model | 1500 | BLS |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1493 cc | 1998 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 52 HP | 176 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1566 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 58 L |
