1964 Volkswagen 1500 vs. 2010 Mazda 6

To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 6 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 6 weights approximately 548 kg more than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Volkswagen 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Volkswagen 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Volkswagen 1500 2010 Mazda 6
Make Volkswagen Mazda
Model 1500 6
Year Released 1964 2010
Body Type Convertible Sedan
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 1493 cc 2500 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 52 HP 170 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 930 kg 1478 kg
Vehicle Length 4200 mm 4920 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1471 mm
Wheelbase Size 2430 mm 2789 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 L 70 L