1964 Volkswagen 1500 vs. 2012 Audi RS3
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Audi RS3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 283 more horse power than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Volkswagen 1500.
Because 2012 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Volkswagen 1500 | 2012 Audi RS3 | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Audi |
| Model | 1500 | RS3 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1493 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 52 HP | 335 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
