1964 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia vs. 2012 Ford Ka
To start off, 2012 Ford Ka is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia would be higher. At 1,493 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Ka (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1964 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1964 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia.
Because 1964 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia | 2012 Ford Ka | |
Make | Volkswagen | Ford |
Model | Karmann-Ghia | Ka |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1493 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 40 L |