1964 Volvo 120 vs. 1982 Buick Century
To start off, 1982 Buick Century is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Buick Century is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Buick Century (85 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 120. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Buick Century should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 120.
Because 1964 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Buick Century (224 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 120. (144 Nm). This means 1982 Buick Century will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Volvo 120 | 1982 Buick Century | |
| Make | Volvo | Buick |
| Model | 120 | Century |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1778 cc | 4300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 85 HP |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 224 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4803 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1763 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1364 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2662 mm |
