1964 Volvo 120 vs. 2002 Jeep Liberty
To start off, 2002 Jeep Liberty is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Liberty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Liberty (151 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 120. (86 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Liberty should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jeep Liberty weights approximately 725 kg more than 1964 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Jeep Liberty is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Volvo 120. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Liberty will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Volvo 120 | 2002 Jeep Liberty | |
Make | Volvo | Jeep |
Model | 120 | Liberty |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1778 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 151 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 84.2 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2660 mm |