1964 Volvo 120 vs. 2007 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2007 Ford Falcon is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford Falcon (210 HP) has 143 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 120. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Ford Falcon weights approximately 475 kg more than 1964 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 120. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2007 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Volvo 120 | 2007 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Volvo | Ford |
Model | 120 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1964 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1778 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 144 Nm | 357 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1485 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 68 L |