1964 Volvo 220 vs. 1983 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1983 Toyota Corona is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 2,366 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Toyota Corona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Toyota Corona (116 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Toyota Corona should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Toyota Corona weights approximately 120 kg more than 1964 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Toyota Corona (198 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1983 Toyota Corona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Volvo 220 | 1983 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Volvo | Toyota |
Model | 220 | Corona |
Year Released | 1964 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1776 cc | 2366 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2510 mm |