1964 Volvo 220 vs. 2005 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2005 Nissan 350Z is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 3,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan 350Z (276 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan 350Z weights approximately 820 kg more than 1964 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan 350Z (372 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Volvo 220 | 2005 Nissan 350Z | |
Make | Volvo | Nissan |
Model | 220 | 350Z |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1776 cc | 3489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 372 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1835 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 80 L |