1964 Volvo 220 vs. 2005 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC90 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo XC90 (208 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1080 kg more than 1964 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo XC90 (340 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2005 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Volvo 220 | 2005 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Volvo | Volvo |
Model | 220 | XC90 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1776 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 72 L |