1964 Volvo 220 vs. 2010 Honda Jazz
To start off, 2010 Honda Jazz is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,776 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Jazz (77 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 220. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Jazz should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Jazz weights approximately 33 kg more than 1964 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Volvo 220 (144 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda Jazz. (110 Nm). This means 1964 Volvo 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda Jazz.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Volvo 220 | 2010 Honda Jazz | |
| Make | Volvo | Honda |
| Model | 220 | Jazz |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1776 cc | 1245 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 77 HP |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 110 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1048 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 42 L |
