1964 Volvo 220 vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (459 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 385 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1321 kg more than 1964 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (630 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 486 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Volvo 220 | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Volvo | Jeep |
| Model | 220 | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1776 cc | 6400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 459 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 630 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2336 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2156 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1756 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2916 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 93 L |
