1964 Willys-Overland Aero vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Willys-Overland Aero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Willys-Overland Aero would be higher. At 2,638 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Willys-Overland Aero is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Willys-Overland Aero is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Willys-Overland Aero. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Willys-Overland Aero | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Willys-Overland | Mazda |
Model | Aero | 3 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2638 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2639 mm |