1964 Zastava 1500 vs. 1997 Honda Integra

To start off, 1997 Honda Integra is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Honda Integra (176 HP) has 123 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 1500. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Honda Integra weights approximately 215 kg more than 1964 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Honda Integra has automatic transmission and 1964 Zastava 1500 has manual transmission. 1964 Zastava 1500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Honda Integra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: