1964 Zastava 1500 vs. 2011 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2011 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Peugeot RCZ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Peugeot RCZ (156 HP) has 103 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 1500. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 1500.
Because 1964 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot RCZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Peugeot RCZ has automatic transmission and 1964 Zastava 1500 has manual transmission. 1964 Zastava 1500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Peugeot RCZ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Zastava 1500 | 2011 Peugeot RCZ | |
| Make | Zastava | Peugeot |
| Model | 1500 | RCZ |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 1295 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 156 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4287 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1845 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1359 mm |
