1964 Zastava 1500 vs. 2011 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2011 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Saab 03-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Saab 03-Sep (210 HP) has 157 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 1500. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 1500.
Because 1964 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Saab 03-Sep (299 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2011 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Zastava 1500 | 2011 Saab 03-Sep | |
| Make | Zastava | Saab |
| Model | 1500 | 03-Sep |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 1295 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 93 Nm | 299 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4646 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1781 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1438 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2675 mm |
