1964 Zastava 850 K vs. 2012 Mazda 5
To start off, 2012 Mazda 5 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 5 (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 5 weights approximately 630 kg more than 1964 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Zastava 850 K | 2012 Mazda 5 | |
| Make | Zastava | Mazda |
| Model | 850 K | 5 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1485 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4585 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1615 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2751 mm |
