1964 ZAZ Jalta vs. 2006 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2006 Ford Falcon is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 ZAZ Jalta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 ZAZ Jalta would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Falcon (210 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1964 ZAZ Jalta. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1964 ZAZ Jalta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Falcon weights approximately 855 kg more than 1964 ZAZ Jalta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 ZAZ Jalta. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 ZAZ Jalta.
Compare all specifications:
1964 ZAZ Jalta | 2006 Ford Falcon | |
Make | ZAZ | Ford |
Model | Jalta | Falcon |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 886 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 27 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 52 Nm | 357 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 54.5 mm | 99.3 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1485 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2730 mm |