1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 1958 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1965 Abarth 1300 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac DeVille (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1505 kg more than 1965 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth 1300 | 1958 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 1300 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2135 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3300 mm |
