1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1965 Abarth 1300 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,453 cc, 1960 Toyota Master RR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Abarth 1300 (137 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 580 kg more than 1965 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth 1300 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Abarth | Toyota |
| Model | 1300 | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 75 L |
