1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 1990 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1990 Ford Mustang is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1990 Ford Mustang. (105 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford Mustang weights approximately 630 kg more than 1965 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth 1300 | 1990 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1300 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1965 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2301 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 45 L |