1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura TL (200 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300.
Because 1965 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth 1300 | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Abarth | Acura |
Model | 1300 | TL |
Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2840 mm |