1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 1996 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 1996 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (238 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300.
Because 1965 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth 1300 | 1996 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | Abarth | Oldsmobile |
Model | 1300 | SS |
Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 68 L |