1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 1996 Volvo 850
To start off, 1996 Volvo 850 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,461 cc (5 cylinders), 1996 Volvo 850 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Volvo 850 (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Volvo 850 should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Volvo 850 weights approximately 863 kg more than 1965 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volvo 850, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth 1300 | 1996 Volvo 850 | |
Make | Abarth | Volvo |
Model | 1300 | 850 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1493 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2670 mm |