1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 1998 Ford Cougar
To start off, 1998 Ford Cougar is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,544 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Cougar (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Cougar should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Cougar weights approximately 789 kg more than 1965 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Cougar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth 1300 | 1998 Ford Cougar | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1300 | Cougar |
Year Released | 1965 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2544 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1419 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 60 L |