1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 557 kg more than 1965 Abarth 1300.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Abarth 1300 | 2000 Chevrolet Astro | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | 1300 | Astro |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 4300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1187 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 64 L |
