1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2000 Proton 300
To start off, 2000 Proton 300 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Proton 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2000 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2000 Proton 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Proton 300 weights approximately 405 kg more than 1965 Abarth 1300.
Because 1965 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Proton 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth 1300 | 2000 Proton 300 | |
Make | Abarth | Proton |
Model | 1300 | 300 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2450 mm |