1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2000 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2000 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota RAV4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota RAV4 (146 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota RAV4 should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota RAV4 weights approximately 645 kg more than 1965 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota RAV4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota RAV4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth 1300 | 2000 Toyota RAV4 | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 1300 | RAV4 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 57 L |