1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2002 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 5,327 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Suburban (282 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 1700 kg more than 1965 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth 1300 | 2002 Chevrolet Suburban | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 1300 | Suburban |
Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 5327 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 117 L |