1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 2003 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 263 more horse power than 1965 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1965 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 848 kg more than 1965 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth 1300 | 2003 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1300 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 68 L |